Big ValleyBig ValleyBig ValleyBig Valley
  • People
  • SERVICES
  • WORK
  • INSIGHT
  • CONTACT

PR vs. Content Marketing: Not Quite

NextPrevious

PR vs. Content Marketing: Not Quite

By Tim Marklein | Communications, Digital, Marketing, Research + Analytics, Social | 0 comment | 4 April, 2014 | 0

As a long-time content marketer and public relations guy, I was intrigued — and conflicted — to see this headline yesterday:

PR is 80% more effective than marketing

Skipping past the headline capitalization issues (“Is” should be and “than” should not), half of me screamed “yes” and half of me sighed “oh no.” Then the data junkie in me rallied around the certainty of “80% more effective.” Time to dig a little deeper.

The key with any study like this is to get past the headlines and ground yourself in the data, including the definitions and methodology behind it. In this case, I was pleasantly surprised with the clarity and robustness of the study (conducted by Nielsen and commissioned by inPowered). Specifically, the study was lab-based (not survey-based) and evaluated the impact of three content types — expert content, user reviews and branded content — on 900 consumers over several months. Impact was evaluated across three vectors — familiarity, affinity and purchase consideration. Not exactly the sales/marketing funnel, but relatable.

 

 

The bottom line: Expert content was the most effective in all three impact areas —  specifically 88% more effective than branded content in driving familiarity, 50% more impact on affinity and 38% more on purchase consideration. User reviews had reasonable impact on affinity and familiarity, but surprisingly low impact on purchase consideration. Branded content had similar impact on all three vectors.

 

 

Re-interpreting the results based on my own experience and analysis with hundreds of companies, this *is* definitely good validation for the impact good public relations can have on audiences, including sales and reputation and other business outcomes. However, it should *not* be distorted by “silo advocates” to claim one-upsmanship for their discipline. If anything, the lesson of digital and social marketing is the need to *integrate* and *orchestrate* not separate. All marketing disciplines should use this data — together — to plan and program the most impactful content that will drive conversation, engagement and conversion across all available channels (online and offline).

Equally important, this data reinforces that public relations and social media shouldn’t be seen simply as “awareness” disciplines — that earned media and third-party credibility have powerful impact later in the marketing funnel (consideration, preference, loyalty) as well as longer-term impacts (reputation, advocacy and brand equity) that are typically overlooked. Regardless of your traditional discipline, it’s time to re-mix marketing and use data, strategy and creativity — not functional heritage or channel bias — to guide the path forward.

content

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NextPrevious

Big Valley Marketing

Data-Driven Consulting for
Technology Marketers

We support the 1% Pledge for
early-stage corporate philanthropy

Contact

Founder & CEO
Tim Marklein
tim@bigvalley.co
m: 415-999-2006
@tmarklein

Talent + Culture
workwithus@bigvalley.co

New Business
hireus@bigvalley.co

Recent Posts

  • RSAC 2023: Notable Sessions at This Year’s Show

    I attended my first RSA Conference in 1997. While sessions have changed

    21 March, 2023
  • RSAC 2023: Tips for In-Person Conferences and How to Make the Biggest Splash

    The Roads Most Traveled Take Us to RSA 🚗 For Josh Swarz,

    15 March, 2023
  • Top Conversations in Tech Jan’23: The Matrix was a documentary

    Welcome to the January 2023 edition of Top Conversations in Technology, where we

    10 March, 2023
Copyright 2023 | All Rights Reserved
  • People
  • SERVICES
  • WORK
  • INSIGHT
  • CONTACT
Big Valley